- Storage White Papers
Reading Chuck’s blog during my vacation, I stopped on his comment that multi-vendor environments are on the decline due to their complexity and the hassle of dealing with multiple vendors.
I have to say that firstly, I don’t believe this and secondly and companies with large storage environments would be mad not to consider a multi-vendor setup.
The reasons people have problems with multi-vendor environments are because they don’t spend time turning their storage into a commodity. EMC and HDS both recommend their own LUN sizes; each will sell you their management solutions; each will have their own support matrices.
But these things can and should be standardised. It is a simple task to define and migrate to consistent LUN sizes, regardless of vendor hardware. Software tools can be simplified; most people choose use command line or the basic configuration tools rather than the bloated EMC tools, so no problem there. In addition, scripting can be developed for failover and PIT/Snapshot management, making their use generic across vendors. Finally, driver/firmware/HBA/fabric standards can all be established to converge on a common set across all storage vendors.
Once storage has been established as a commodity, any new purchases can come from any of the vendors in your multi-vendor strategy.
Oh and one last thought; do you really believe HDS, IBM and EMC would give you the absolute best price if they know you can only use their product on most of your server farm environment? Competition within the storage market is a false premise; moving to another hardware platform to replace an existing one takes months (in some cases years). Vendors know that customers’ threats to move everything to another platform are only hollow unless you have a true multi-vendor strategy.
_uacct = “UA-1104321-2″;
- Netapp: The Inflexibility of Flexvols (12,267)
- Windows Server 2012 (Windows Server “8″) – Storage Spaces (11,435)
- Enterprise Computing: Why Thin Provisioning Is Not The Holy Grail for Utilisation (9,641)
- Comparing iSCSI Targets – Microsoft, StarWind, iSCSI Cake and Kernsafe – Part I (7,474)
- Windows Server 2012 (Windows Server “8″) – Virtual Fibre Channel (7,334)
- Review: Compellent Storage Center – Part II (7,307)
- Why Does Microsoft Hyper-V Not Support NFS? (6,696)
- How To: Enable iSNS Server in Windows 2008 (6,252)
- Data ONTAP 8.0 – Part III (5,737)
- How Many IOPS? (4,673)
- The Virtual Machine is a Legacy Construct (19)
- Netapp: The Inflexibility of Flexvols (11)
- XtremIO: What You Need to Know (Updated) (8)
- Reinventing The Storage Array and Learning From Blackblaze (8)
- HP 3PAR 7450 All Flash Array (6)
- Understanding EVA (5)
- Black Friday Comes Early for Violin (4)
- Why Does Microsoft Hyper-V Not Support NFS? (4)
- Understanding the Value of Seagate Kinetic (4)
- Quick Thought: Gartner SSD Market Analysis (4)